Brand development that increases sales velocity, guaranteed.

3 Things to Look Out for When Choosing Packaging.

As a graphic and packaging design firm, a great deal of our focus, when it comes to fabricating a package or web page or logo, is on the aesthetic criteria. This isn’t exclusively because we, as designers, are shallow, appearance-obsessed people (although this plays a significant role, and one look at our washboard abs and our 300-lb bench presses will tell you this is time well spent). This is largely because the human eye is drawn to strong design elements, which affect product sales.

However, the design of a package has to combine beauty and practicality, since a great deal of the time, the package informs the product’s overall utility. When choosing your packaging, don’t be seduced merely by novelty or allure — think about all of the potential sales losses when your package deteriorates during transport: when your package is vulnerable to bacteria and nature, or when your customers find that the package design prevents efficient use of the product.

Consider the Use of the Product

Surprisingly, many product manufacturers don’t often think of how consumers use their products. Oh sure, even the most dim-witted cosmetics executive knows that shampoo is used in the shower, but he/she might not realize that some deep conditioners are also used in the shower, and might be better served by being packaged in a bottle rather than a jar, where spillage is less likely. Similarly, foods largely taken on picnics or used while tailgating would be better served by being packaged in a container that’s easy to grab from (finger foods, anyone?).

Consider Transport of the Product

We’ve said time and time again that a product’s package must be able to stand apart on a shelf next to its competitors. But uniqueness can’t take precedence over stability, and a great deal of engineering has gone into determining the best shape, size, materials and dimensions of packaging for certain items during transportation.

Clearly, a product manufacturer wants packaging that allows maximum units to be transported at minimum cost. Moreover, the manufacturer wants the contents of the package to remain intact – no breakage, spoilage, etc.

If the product will be distributed locally – within only a few states, for example – the packaging should be suited to ground transport that will arrive at its destination within only a few days. However, once operations have expanded, the perfectly fine packaging for transportation to local markets might become wholly inappropriate for long-distance shipments. If the products has to be stored at a transportation facility, the packaging must be sufficient to ward off airborne particulates that could be circulating in a foreign environment. If the product is to be transported to an extreme climate that might be exceptionally moist, dry, hot or cold, the packaging must be able to keep the product from being affected.

Consider Storage of the Product

How will the product likely be stored? Is it a product that will be kept in the moist environment of a bathroom, or under the kitchen sink? Will the product be more popular in hot, moist climates than in dry, cold climates? Is it likely that the product will be used bit by bit or in its entirety when it is first opened? Must the crunch factor be preserved, or should crunch be avoided at all costs, like in mayonnaise?

Keeping the product fresh for as long as possible after it has been opened is critical for food products, but it’s surprisingly necessary for cosmetic items. Who wants to use a shampoo/lotion/hair gel that turns into a congealed mass in the bottle? When choosing your packaging, try to opt for materials that to the best job at thwarting the deteriorating effects of oxygen, moisture, high heat and extreme cold.

So, what have we learned today? We learned that style shouldn’t trump substance, even though style is often confused for substance in our racket. We learned that a package is often a product component, which is not always considered but often recognized when a company changes its product packaging. (“I can’t get this bottle in my stationary bike cup holder! Am I supposed to clutch it between my teeth?”) Most importantly, we learned that no matter how clever your product packaging is, it’s a fail if it facilitates crispy mayonnaise.

Data-Driven Brand Development

Want a best-selling brand? SmashBrand is a brand development company for FMCG and CPG brands. From brand strategy to packaging design testing, our Path To Performance™ process guarantees a retail performance lift. Book a time to discuss your project with our team.

Subscribe to
Nice Package.

SmashBrand’s Nice Package: Stay current with our latest insights

Free Resource.
CPG product repositioning guide.
CPG product repositioning guide.

Explore the five undeniable signs your CPG product needs repositioning along with strategies for leveraging consumer insights for a guaranteed market lift.

Download Whitepaper About CPG product repositioning guide.

More from SmashBrand

NICE PACKAGE, Design

The Problem with Packaging Design That Looks Different.

Most brands chase standout visuals without asking a harder question, does it make the product easier to recognize and buy? That gap kills performance. If your design stands out but doesn’t convert, it’s failing. Want to see why? Read on.

Category Insights, Shopping With Christy

Why Rao’s Soup Misses the Mark on This Packaging Design.

Brand extension can be a powerful growth strategy, but only if it’s executed with clarity. In this case, the transition from pasta sauce into soup creates confusion rather than differentiation. The biggest issue is visual overlap. Using the same jar, color palette, and overall look as the pasta sauce line makes it difficult to immediately…

Category Insights

This Retail Display Tells You Everything About a Brand in Trouble

When packaging starts working against the brand, it shows up quickly, especially on the shelf. In this case, the execution creates confusion instead of clarity. The most immediate issue is readability. If shoppers can’t quickly identify the brand name or fully read the tagline, the pack loses its primary job: recognition. “Thirst’s worst” is a…

Category Insights

Why This Parent and CPG Marketer Secretly Loves This “White” Bread

Sometimes the most powerful packaging change is verbal. A single line of copy can unlock the entire value proposition. In this case, the product already solved a real consumer tension: the desire for healthier bread that still feels and tastes like white bread. But previously, that benefit was implied rather than stated. Shoppers had to…

Category Insights

Wait, Sargento Makes Crackers Now? Not Exactly

Brand extensions only work when trust transfers seamlessly, and that’s where this execution creates friction. At first glance, the product signals cheese, not crackers. The name, visuals, and dominant cues all lean heavily into cheese equity, leaving the actual product format unclear. That confusion matters. Shoppers rely on quick recognition, and if they can’t immediately…

Category Insights

Is Coke Lime making a Comeback?

Limited-time innovation only works if timing and design align with consumer expectations. A citrus-forward cola immediately signals refreshment, which is typically associated with warmer months. Launching that profile in October creates a subtle disconnect, even if the execution is strong. From a strategy standpoint, this is a classic line extension play, leveraging an existing brand…