Brand development that increases sales velocity, guaranteed.

Hillary’s Campaign Logo: Design Fail?

As if running for president on a first-name basis weren’t controversial enough, now Hillary is generating a ruckus over her campaign logo.

Oh, Hillary. Between fighting the urge to swipe right and unlock some as-yet-unseen-screen and driving around in constant right-veering circles looking for a hospital, we hardly know where to start with your political logo design.

Whether you’re Team Red or Team Blue, graphic design experts on both sides of the fence can finally agree on one thing: Hillary’s logo is just plain not good. Within virtual nanoseconds of the public unveiling, her campaign headquarters was barraged by redesign suggestions and her Twitter feed was overrun by pithy one-liners.

Ouch.

Just for kicks, let’s take a look at some of the biggest logo no-nos that Hillary’s stalwart H-with-an-arrow so majestically encompasses.

Lack of Contrast

One major problem with Hillary’s political logo design is the lack of contrast.

What’s that? You say red and blue provide plenty of contrast? We’ll stop you right there. Yes, we do realize that red and blue are standard political logo colors and contrast in a very patriotic way. The problem is that the contrast value will not translate well to black and white, so it’s too hot. (And by “not so hot” we mean “absolutely not, will not at all in any way.”)

The design isn’t interesting enough on its own to carry its weight in greyscale, which means every pamphlet that’s sent over to the monochrome printer in the interest of saving on color ink cartridges will end up looking pretty much like an H with a slightly pointy tumor on one side, nary a dramatic arrow in sight.

One of the first rules of logo design in any capacity is to make sure the design works across a wide range of circumstances: billboards and business cards both; full-color brochures and crappy photocopies equally. Hillary’s logo does not pass this test. (And by “not pass” we again mean “absolutely not, will not at all in any way.”)

Brand Identity

Does anyone else remember that old joke about how Hillary and Bill pulled into a gas station and her ex-boyfriend is the guy at the pump? As they drive away, Bill says something like “Boy, it’s a good thing you married the guy who became president instead of that guy back there, huh?” And Hillary says, “If I had married him, he would’ve been president.” That’s the kind of legacy we’re dealing with here.

And to represent that level of chutzpah, we have…

A big H.

With a red arrow.

An utterly yawn-worthy graphic that would look ideally at home on Sesame Street but falls embarrassingly short of even beginning to encompass Hillary’s bona fide urban legend status.

Regardless of the direction in which you plan to toss your vote, there’s no denying that Hillary is a force who demands to be reckoned with. Maybe her logo designer thought that this fact was so accepted already there was no point in beating a dead horse over the head with a decent logo design? Who can say? Most of the Internet agrees that there was very little alleged “thinking” at all behind that thing.

Look, your logo needs to be you—everything you stand for, everything you believe in, everything you deliver—summarized neatly in one all-encompassing symbol. Is that a lot of pressure to put on a single graphic? Yes. Yes it is. That’s why you hire professional brand designers who spend hours and hours researching everything you stand for/believe in/deliver before coming up with a logo that represents all of those things. While looking fantastic. Whether large, small, or in greyscale. (The logo. Not the designers. Well, maybe the designers too.)

Citizens United for Hillary’s New Logo

The verdict is in, and it’s unanimous: everyone says Hillary’s political logo design was planned with malice aforethought and deserves nothing less than the death penalty. Her designer—and the Commodore 64 s/he rode in on—oughta be run outta town on a rail. Grab the pitchforks, everyone!

Still, we can’t put all the blame on the lowly designer. Because love Hillary or hate her, we’re not sure what degree of imagination can reasonably be expected from someone with such a famous devotion to the decidedly unimaginative pantsuit.

Data-driven brand and packaging design for maximum shelf impact.

Win at retail with data-driven packaging design that captures attention and lifts sales. As a packaging design firm, we don’t guess. We test, optimize, and guarantee results. From shelf impact to purchase intent, we make every word on your pack work harder. Let’s build packaging that performs.

Subscribe to
Nice Package.

SmashBrand’s Nice Package: Stay current with our latest insights

Free Resource.
CPG product repositioning guide.
CPG product repositioning guide.

Explore the five undeniable signs your CPG product needs repositioning along with strategies for leveraging consumer insights for a guaranteed market lift.

Download Whitepaper About CPG product repositioning guide.

More from SmashBrand

NICE PACKAGE, Design

8 Strategies to Get Taste Cues Right at Shelf

Learn 8 strategies to improve taste cues in pancake mix packaging design and boost shelf impact, conversion, and perceived flavor instantly.

NICE PACKAGE, Design

The Problem with Packaging Design That Looks Different.

Most brands chase standout visuals without asking a harder question, does it make the product easier to recognize and buy? That gap kills performance. If your design stands out but doesn’t convert, it’s failing. Want to see why? Read on.

Category Insights, Shopping With Christy

Why Rao’s Soup Misses the Mark on This Packaging Design.

Brand extension can be a powerful growth strategy, but only if it’s executed with clarity. In this case, the transition from pasta sauce into soup creates confusion rather than differentiation. The biggest issue is visual overlap. Using the same jar, color palette, and overall look as the pasta sauce line makes it difficult to immediately…

Category Insights

This Retail Display Tells You Everything About a Brand in Trouble

When packaging starts working against the brand, it shows up quickly, especially on the shelf. In this case, the execution creates confusion instead of clarity. The most immediate issue is readability. If shoppers can’t quickly identify the brand name or fully read the tagline, the pack loses its primary job: recognition. “Thirst’s worst” is a…

Category Insights

Why This Parent and CPG Marketer Secretly Loves This “White” Bread

Sometimes the most powerful packaging change is verbal. A single line of copy can unlock the entire value proposition. In this case, the product already solved a real consumer tension: the desire for healthier bread that still feels and tastes like white bread. But previously, that benefit was implied rather than stated. Shoppers had to…

Category Insights

Wait, Sargento Makes Crackers Now? Not Exactly

Brand extensions only work when trust transfers seamlessly, and that’s where this execution creates friction. At first glance, the product signals cheese, not crackers. The name, visuals, and dominant cues all lean heavily into cheese equity, leaving the actual product format unclear. That confusion matters. Shoppers rely on quick recognition, and if they can’t immediately…