Most brands fail at sustainability. They launch eco friendly packaging design with good intentions but end up with solutions that are too expensive, fragile, or confusing for consumers. The result? Wasted resources, frustrated shoppers, and lost shelf impact. Meanwhile, demand for sustainable packaging keeps rising, and brands that get it right gain a competitive edge.
According to Bain and Company, only 7% of companies succeed—half the rate of other transformations. Even worse, 80% of companies that started less than a year ago report that their sustainability programs are not on track. Effective sustainable packaging design isn’t just about swapping materials. It requires a strategic balance between packaging material, performance, cost, and consumer behavior.
This article explains what works. You’ll learn to create friendly packaging that meets sustainability goals without sacrificing sales, brand impact, or functionality.
Common mistakes that undermine sustainable efforts.
Brands are pressured to reduce packaging waste, but many rush into sustainable packaging solutions without considering the details. The right materials, design, and messaging all matter—get one wrong, and the whole strategy falls apart. Some choices seem sustainable but create more significant problems in production, logistics, or consumer use. Others sacrifice functionality or brand appeal, making the product less effective.
Here’s where companies go wrong—and how to avoid these costly packaging design mistakes.
Choosing the wrong materials.
Every green packaging doesn’t work for every single product. Brands eager to adopt sustainable packaging solutions often switch to compostable packaging or alternative materials without considering durability, cost, or shelf life. For instance, some biodegradable films fail to provide the necessary barrier against moisture and oxygen in food packaging design, leading to faster spoilage.
Similarly, replacing plastic in bottle packaging with certain plant-based materials may result in weaker structures prone to cracking. The key is selecting materials that balance sustainability and functionality, ensuring the packaging solution protects the product without contributing to packaging waste.
Overcomplicating the design.
Simplicity sells. When brands over-engineer food packaging, they cause frustration. A minimalist packaging approach, where every component serves a purpose, improves the user experience while minimizing excess materials. A common mistake in packaging design is adding multiple layers or hard-to-remove seals for extra protection, which makes products harder to open.
In coffee packaging design, for example, resealable closures are helpful, but consumers may completely discard them if they’re too complex or fragile. The best sustainable packaging solutions are intuitive—easy to open, use, and dispose of without hassle.
Ignoring consumer behavior.
Even the most eco-friendly packaging fails if consumers dispose of it incorrectly. While edible and compostable packaging sounds innovative, if buyers don’t know what to do with them, they’ll likely toss them in the regular trash. Green packaging must align with existing recycling and waste systems.
For instance, using mixed materials (like paper wrapped around plastic) in bottle packaging design can confuse consumers and hinder recycling efforts. The solution? Clear food packaging labels that explain disposal steps in a way people will follow. If recycling isn’t intuitive, sustainability efforts fall apart.
Greenwashing pitfalls.
Consumers are more informed than ever, and misleading claims can damage a brand. Stating that coffee packaging design is “eco-friendly” without specifics raises red flags. If a brand claims to use sustainable packaging solutions but relies on non-recyclable laminates, it’s only adding to packaging waste.
Certifications, transparent sourcing, and actual environmental impact data help build trust. If a food packaging design claims to be biodegradable but only breaks down under industrial conditions that aren’t widely available, it’s not truly a sustainable packaging solution. Brands that exaggerate sustainability efforts risk backlash worse than not making changes at all.
Sacrificing brand impact.
Sustainability shouldn’t come at the expense of visibility. A package still needs to stand out in a crowded market. Some brands strip away branding elements in the name of minimalist packaging, but if the product blends into the shelf, it won’t sell.
The challenge is to reduce packaging waste without sacrificing a strong brand presence. Materials, colors, and structure all play a role. For instance, opting for recycled paper or soy-based inks can maintain visual appeal while supporting a green packaging strategy. Packaging should look premium, not just eco-friendly.
What makes an eco-friendly package work?
A genuinely eco-friendly package reduces waste, minimizes carbon footprint, and protects the product. It must also be practical for consumers, efficient for manufacturers, and compliant with recycling infrastructure. The wrong choices lead to higher costs and weaker performance. Here’s what separates sustainable packaging practices from those that fail.
Material selection that balances sustainability and function.
Some materials sound sustainable but don’t hold up in the real world. Compostable packaging works in theory, but without appropriate disposal infrastructure, it’s just another source of waste. Corrugated packaging made from recycled material is a strong choice for shipping and protection, but it’s not ideal for food or moisture-sensitive products. Cutting out plastic packaging can weaken durability, damage goods, and create more waste. The right packaging material must balance sustainability with function—protecting the product while being easy to dispose of responsibly.
Clever structural design without compromising strength.
A sustainable package should use fewer materials without sacrificing durability. At this stage, graphic design, packaging design, and engineering work together to create a structure that eliminates excess while maintaining shelf presence. Lightweighting strategies—such as using thinner yet stronger corrugated packaging—reduce material use and lower shipping emissions. But cutting too much can make packaging flimsy, damaging products and creating more waste.
Reducing plastic packaging might seem like an easy win for fragile items, but removing protective layers without an alternative solution can lead to more returns and replacements. Instead of eliminating protective elements, brands can explore recycled material options or innovative designs that require less raw material while maintaining strength.
Consumer-friendly disposal and recyclability.
A package can only be sustainable if consumers dispose of it properly. Many brands use biodegradable packaging. Others combine materials, like plastic-lined paper, that aren’t widely recyclable, resulting in waste. If packaging requires extra effort to break down into recyclable parts, most consumers will not. Labeling and designing graphics instructing users on proper disposal can significantly enhance recycling rates. Reusable packaging is most effective when it provides an easy return or refill system.
The role of testing in sustainable packaging design.
Sustainability means nothing if product packaging fails in real-world conditions. A fragile box, a leaking pouch, or a poorly sealed bag leads to damaged products, wasted resources, and frustrated customers. Whether it’s packaging design for pet brands, vintage packaging design, or modern flexible packaging, durability and functionality must be tested before launch.
In-market testing ensures sustainable packaging materials hold up during shipping, storage, and consumer use. While a plantable packaging concept may sound innovative, it won’t survive retail if the ink bleeds or the structure weakens. Even an eco-friendly material must be tested for performance—weak adhesives, tearing, or poor barrier protection can make sustainability efforts meaningless.
Data-driven testing eliminates costly redesigns by proving what works before production. By integrating sustainable practices with honest consumer feedback, brands ensure their sustainable materials are eco-friendly, practical, durable, and ready for market use.

Path to Performance™
Taking a results-obsessed approach to CPG package design.
Learn how SmashBrand’s proprietary process – rooted in scientific principles, informed by data, and validated by your target audience – takes the guesswork out of package design and delivers guaranteed results.
Integrating sustainability without compromising performance.
Sustainability only works when it fits within real business constraints. A great eco-friendly packaging solution must align with cost, supply chain feasibility, and retailer expectations. If switching from traditional packaging to recycled plastic slows production or drives up costs, it’s not a proper solution; it’s a liability.
The packaging design process starts with balancing sustainability and performance. This means selecting eco-friendly packaging solutions that protect the product, meet regulatory standards, and remain cost-effective. Optimizing materials, reducing excess layers, and improving logistics efficiency all help brands reach sustainability targets without sacrificing shelf appeal.
Strong branding must stay intact. A shift to FMCG packaging design with more sustainable elements must not dilute recognition. Innovative packaging design ideas make sustainability a strength, not a compromise, ensuring success in the evolving packaging industry.

Nice Package
Don’t miss out on our monthly newsletter Nice Package!
Each month, we deliver a data-driven newsletter directly to your inbox, unpacking a critical topic in the FMCG & CPG industry.
"*" indicates required fields
Steps to crafting eco-friendly packaging design.
A successful shift to eco friendly packaging solutions starts with a clear plan. Rushing into changes without assessing the impact can lead to higher costs, supply chain issues, or packaging that fails in real-world conditions. Here’s how to make informed, effective decisions:
Assess your current packaging footprint: Identify inefficiencies in retail packaging, pinpoint excess material use, and evaluate whether your current packaging is truly recyclable. Understanding what works—and what doesn’t—sets the foundation for meaningful change.
Identify opportunities for improvement: Switching to a more sustainable design doesn’t mean sacrificing performance. Look for ways to eliminate waste, replace harmful materials with eco-friendly materials, and clarify disposal instructions to increase recycling rates.
Test before you commit: Even the best eco-friendly packaging solution can fail if it doesn’t perform in-market. Testing ensures that your new sustainable material holds up in transit, meets retailer requirements, and resonates with consumers before a full rollout.
Subscribe to
Nice Package.
A monthly newsletter that unpacks a critical topic in the FMCG & CPG industry.
Free Resource.

CPG product repositioning guide.
Explore the five undeniable signs your CPG product needs repositioning along with strategies for leveraging consumer insights for a guaranteed market lift.
Learn More About CPG product repositioning guide.