Brand development that increases sales velocity, guaranteed.

The Seven Cardinal Sins of Package Design.

It’s no secret that many industries don’t exactly steer their ships according to the moral compass. Perhaps those experimenting on animals, polluting the environment, or employing child labor come to mind. While we in the product design and branding field stay away from these unquestionably despicable practices, we don’t all have untarnished halos.

Package designers are fallible too; even the new, way cooler Pope would concur. And while we generally stick to the venial sins for which we can atone with a couple Hail Marys and an extra fiver in the collection plate, we’ve also been known to commit the occasional big kahuna of wickedness. Let’s look at the seven cardinal sins of package design.

Packaging Design Sin #1: Pride

Did you know that pride is generally considered the original cardinal sin and the source of all the others? For package designers, pride is unforgivable when it lets you rest on your laurels. In the ever-changing field of package design, it’s definitely a cardinal sin to think it’s not your responsibility to stay up on the latest trends and developments in the industry. You don’t want to see your clients’ products staying on retailers’ shelves while watching better-packaged goods making their way to the checkout. It’s your charge to stay up on the latest advances. If you don’t, it will take more than a Hail Mary to save your bottom line.

Packaging Design Sin #2: Lust

While pride prevents you from acknowledging others’ worth because you’re so fixated on your superiority, lust may make you too engrossed in your competitors. Acknowledging another brand’s seriously sexy design is no sin; we’d be lying if we said Apple’s packaging doesn’t sometimes give us the tingles. But you can take it too far if you convince yourself that what works for a competitor is right for you. Smart design requires investing in what makes products unique. Acknowledge the accomplishments of others without lusting after someone else’s work, and your own designs will have the chance to shine.

Packaging Design Sin #3: Sloth

Oh man, this one’s a doozie. Sloth is laziness, plain and simple. It’s not only a deadly sin in the package design sphere; this is an equal opportunity offense. Lazy package designers recycle the same tired themes repeatedly, slowly amassing a pile of vaguely similar but oddly uninteresting products with no distinguishing features. Get your butt in gear and be bold with branding and design. Your clients – and your coffers – will thank you!

Packaging Design Sin #4: Greed

Hey, Ebenezer, let the other kids play with the Monopoly money! If you’re guilty of thinking that your firm can handle ALL THE CLIENTS, you’re wrong. The best package designers know that not every brand matches their skillsets well. You don’t have to have the maximum number of clients possible; that’s greedy and unwise. We think excellent packaging design is a partnership between the product or line and the packaging design firm. We’re discerning about the brands we develop because package design is not an exact science. We want to give all our clients our fullest attention so that the design process results in the most dynamic packaging possible.

Packaging Design Sin #5: Envy

When we see covet-worthy product packaging, it makes us want to sing the Hallelujah chorus. In a field crowded with awkward, overly complicated, or just plain ugly packaging, we’re happy to acknowledge the achievements of skilled package designers – even our competitors – when they hit a home run. Don’t hate the player, hate the fact that you didn’t come up with something better — and then go do it. We don’t let envy bring us down; we eat it for breakfast, get motivated, and come out swinging (but not like a bad Rocky knockoff, sorry “Grudge Match”).

Packaging Design Sin #6: Gluttony

Too much of a good thing is actually a bad thing if you haven’t guessed. Gluttonous designers of packaging are unfamiliar with the concept of simplicity. We design for the client and the public, not to tickle our own graphical fancy. So don’t over-design packaging to the detriment of the product. Or else, you may spend eternity gorging on humble pie.

Packaging Design Sin #7: Pride

The final cardinal sin of package design (that we’ll admit to) is actually committed not by the designers themselves but by frustrated consumers who become borderline homicidal when attempting to open overly complicated packaging. If you’ve created such a design, you’re an accessory to the sin of wrath. Excellence in design walks the line between beauty and functionality. Repeat offenders of overly complicated packaging design are doomed to an afterlife of opening clamshell packages with no scissors. No mercy.

Data-Driven Brand Development

Want a best-selling brand? SmashBrand is a brand development firm for FMCG and CPG companies. From brand strategy to packaging design testing, our Path To Performance™ process guarantees a retail performance lift. Book a time to discuss your project with our team.

Subscribe to
Nice Package.

SmashBrand’s Nice Package: Stay current with our latest insights

Free Resource.
CPG product repositioning guide.
CPG product repositioning guide.

Explore the five undeniable signs your CPG product needs repositioning along with strategies for leveraging consumer insights for a guaranteed market lift.

Download Whitepaper About CPG product repositioning guide.

More from SmashBrand

NICE PACKAGE, Design

The Problem with Packaging Design That Looks Different.

Most brands chase standout visuals without asking a harder question, does it make the product easier to recognize and buy? That gap kills performance. If your design stands out but doesn’t convert, it’s failing. Want to see why? Read on.

Category Insights, Shopping With Christy

Why Rao’s Soup Misses the Mark on This Packaging Design.

Brand extension can be a powerful growth strategy, but only if it’s executed with clarity. In this case, the transition from pasta sauce into soup creates confusion rather than differentiation. The biggest issue is visual overlap. Using the same jar, color palette, and overall look as the pasta sauce line makes it difficult to immediately…

Category Insights

This Retail Display Tells You Everything About a Brand in Trouble

When packaging starts working against the brand, it shows up quickly, especially on the shelf. In this case, the execution creates confusion instead of clarity. The most immediate issue is readability. If shoppers can’t quickly identify the brand name or fully read the tagline, the pack loses its primary job: recognition. “Thirst’s worst” is a…

Category Insights

Why This Parent and CPG Marketer Secretly Loves This “White” Bread

Sometimes the most powerful packaging change is verbal. A single line of copy can unlock the entire value proposition. In this case, the product already solved a real consumer tension: the desire for healthier bread that still feels and tastes like white bread. But previously, that benefit was implied rather than stated. Shoppers had to…

Category Insights

Wait, Sargento Makes Crackers Now? Not Exactly

Brand extensions only work when trust transfers seamlessly, and that’s where this execution creates friction. At first glance, the product signals cheese, not crackers. The name, visuals, and dominant cues all lean heavily into cheese equity, leaving the actual product format unclear. That confusion matters. Shoppers rely on quick recognition, and if they can’t immediately…

Category Insights

Is Coke Lime making a Comeback?

Limited-time innovation only works if timing and design align with consumer expectations. A citrus-forward cola immediately signals refreshment, which is typically associated with warmer months. Launching that profile in October creates a subtle disconnect, even if the execution is strong. From a strategy standpoint, this is a classic line extension play, leveraging an existing brand…