Shopping with Christy, now on
YouTube.

Featured Video

🎯 What Tic Tac Gets Right About Flavor Naming

Flavor naming is often treated like a creative exercise. Brainstorm a list. Pick what sounds good. Move on. But at shelf, naming does much heavier lifting than most brands acknowledge. In this example, Tic Tac demonstrates how flavor naming can signal distinct usage occasions and consumer need states — all within a few words. “Fresh Mints” does more than just describe flavor. It reinforces a breath-freshening job to be done. The word “fresh” elevates the benefit beyond taste and cues efficacy in seconds. “Fruit Adventure” positions a multi-pack as an experience. It signals variety and exploration which is ideal for someone looking for novelty or sharing occasions. “Orange” takes the opposite approach. No embellishment. No storytelling. Just clarity for a known, loyal super-consumer who wants exactly that flavor and nothing else. Three SKUs. Three different purchase motivations. Three different communication strategies. That’s intentional alignment between naming and consumer need. In CPG, you have only a few seconds to communicate relevance. Naming becomes part of the messaging hierarchy. It reduces friction. It clarifies what the product is for. It signals why it belongs in the basket. When flavor naming is treated purely as creative expression, brands miss that opportunity. When it’s treated as a strategic decision rooted in how people shop, it drives velocity. Follow for more breakdowns on what wins at shelf.