Brand development that increases sales velocity, guaranteed.

Designers Guide: 4 Must-try Package Design Programs.

While we strongly advise using a bona fide packaging design company to design product packaging, the design protégé can come up with his or her own legitimate structured design ideas with the help of decent tools.

Thanks to computer-aided design (CAD) software, the days of squinting over drawing tables, tallying endless rows of calculations with an abacus and manually hot-gluing pieces of dry-cleaner cardboard are over! In this day and age, package designers can employ one of dozens of 3-D package design programs and simply devote all of their time and energy to scrolling through online forums and chatting with program support about just why the hell the program changed all of the dimensions after modifying a single stroke. (Answer: Because you didn’t align the stroke to the inside of the path, duh.)

Options Galore

Yes, there are downsides to working with some design programs – seemingly endless updates; clients unable to view the prototype due to browser incompatibility; non-robust user forums; large, un-emailable files that are difficult to compress – but familiarity with different programs is critical to determining which is the best, most efficient program for your particular needs. Here are a few programs to consider:

Adobe Illustrator

Adobe is the first rung on the structured design ladder if you’re a package design student or hobbyist. Illustrator and Photoshop are excellent foundation programs for junior package designers who want to learn the basics of 3-D imaging, vectors, label placement and all of the purely aesthetic aspects of package design. Illustrator allows even the least expert user to fabricate a computer image of a fairly sophisticated package structure without irksome geometric knowledge, material familiarity or dieline creation.

Impact Design Software

Suppose you’ve graduated from the frolicsome fun of Adobe Illustrator and are looking for a program that will help you manufacture actual packaging that might house products. In that case, the Impact program by Arden Software is an excellent CAD tool. Although packaging design company professionals primarily use it, the layout is streamlined and straightforward enough for a relatively novice packaging designer to understand. The program comes with a library of templates for basic packaging structures that can be manipulated to produce custom specs, along with material types, dimensions and packaging features. There is also an integrated artwork feature that allows the user to import labeling designs to the face of the package.

The diemaking toolset is pretty darned sophisticated, too. The program offers customizable parameters that can define various cuts, creases, different tool angles, and all supporting dieline data.

CAPE Systems

While it may not be as glamorous as the Adobe or Impact programs, CAPE Systems packaging and palletizing software is nonetheless just as valuable.

The CAPE Pack program allows manufacturers to design the best pallet structures for bulk product shipment. You enter the product size, load weight, height, and dimensions for single pallet loads, mixed product pallet loads, case sizes, and pallet style.

KASEMAKE

KASEMAKE packaging design software offers basic packaging design programs and point-of-purchase display parametrics. You can design free-standing display units for any product package – compact discs, beverage containers, books, clothing, live dwarf monkeys, or anything else. Another cool feature is the 3-D background imager, which allows the user to place the point-of-purchase display within a specific store environment and judge how it will look against different shelving displays, lighting schemes, and floor colors and textures.

So, what have we learned today? We’ve learned that there is a package design program for nearly every level of package designer. We’ve learned that product packaging encompasses not only the wrapping around the item itself, but the wrapping around the wrapping of the item, and even though there aren’t any awards for fantastic pallets, there are penalties for horrible ones (damaged products, loss of revenue, job loss, starvation, death). Lastly, we learned that if you are designing a free-standing display for live dwarf monkeys, you darned well better accurately anticipate the retailer’s flooring texture and color.

Data-Driven Brand Development

Want a best-selling brand? SmashBrand is a brand development company for FMCG and CPG brands. From brand strategy to packaging design testing, our Path To Performance™ process guarantees a retail performance lift. Book a time to discuss your project with our team.

Subscribe to
Nice Package.

SmashBrand’s Nice Package: Stay current with our latest insights

Free Resource.
CPG product repositioning guide.
CPG product repositioning guide.

Explore the five undeniable signs your CPG product needs repositioning along with strategies for leveraging consumer insights for a guaranteed market lift.

Download Whitepaper About CPG product repositioning guide.

More from SmashBrand

NICE PACKAGE, Design

The Problem with Packaging Design That Looks Different.

Most brands chase standout visuals without asking a harder question, does it make the product easier to recognize and buy? That gap kills performance. If your design stands out but doesn’t convert, it’s failing. Want to see why? Read on.

Category Insights, Shopping With Christy

Why Rao’s Soup Misses the Mark on This Packaging Design.

Brand extension can be a powerful growth strategy, but only if it’s executed with clarity. In this case, the transition from pasta sauce into soup creates confusion rather than differentiation. The biggest issue is visual overlap. Using the same jar, color palette, and overall look as the pasta sauce line makes it difficult to immediately…

Category Insights

This Retail Display Tells You Everything About a Brand in Trouble

When packaging starts working against the brand, it shows up quickly, especially on the shelf. In this case, the execution creates confusion instead of clarity. The most immediate issue is readability. If shoppers can’t quickly identify the brand name or fully read the tagline, the pack loses its primary job: recognition. “Thirst’s worst” is a…

Category Insights

Why This Parent and CPG Marketer Secretly Loves This “White” Bread

Sometimes the most powerful packaging change is verbal. A single line of copy can unlock the entire value proposition. In this case, the product already solved a real consumer tension: the desire for healthier bread that still feels and tastes like white bread. But previously, that benefit was implied rather than stated. Shoppers had to…

Category Insights

Wait, Sargento Makes Crackers Now? Not Exactly

Brand extensions only work when trust transfers seamlessly, and that’s where this execution creates friction. At first glance, the product signals cheese, not crackers. The name, visuals, and dominant cues all lean heavily into cheese equity, leaving the actual product format unclear. That confusion matters. Shoppers rely on quick recognition, and if they can’t immediately…

Category Insights

Is Coke Lime making a Comeback?

Limited-time innovation only works if timing and design align with consumer expectations. A citrus-forward cola immediately signals refreshment, which is typically associated with warmer months. Launching that profile in October creates a subtle disconnect, even if the execution is strong. From a strategy standpoint, this is a classic line extension play, leveraging an existing brand…