Brand development that increases sales velocity, guaranteed.

Don’t Be Like Jimmy – Don’t Crowdsource Designs.

Gather ‘round and I’ll tell you a story about a man named James; a middle-aged, emotionally bankrupt man who only cares about finding a great deal. James is the owner of a medium-sized business, and although not entirely respected, he was at least thought to possess some aesthetic judgment. He did manage to dress himself every day, after all. One day, he discovered a crowdsourcing design website called 99terribledesigns.com and realized it could save his company a significant amount of money. Poor James.

His marketing team wanted to rebrand their image, so he directed them to run a logo design contest at the crowdsourcing design website he found. He loved the idea that 99terribledesigns.com would sponsor and provide administrative support for a logo design competition between a legion of designers of questionable origin and limited skill for only 250 bucks. The submissions were a dubious lot, but James, who couldn’t tell the difference, felt he had gotten the bargain of his life. Imagine, logos galore—and he only had to pay for one of them!

James’s marketing team was horrified by the choices. None of the designers knew anything about their company culture or the demographic they wanted to serve, nor did they particularly care. Many designers threw together a design without giving it much thought, because there was a 1 in 50 chance that the work would even be selected. The winning design that James picked fused a hammer, sickle, and what appeared to be a fertility doll in an unsavory union. James used the term “make it awesome” on the intake form he submitted to describe his dream logo.  Sweet!

James’s new allegiance with crowdsourcing design work was a source of contention for his marketing team. They preferred to work with designers who take the time to understand their company directly. Designers with a high talent level and one-to-one communications.  They wanted to review their portfolios, verify their credentials, and be reasonably sure that they were capable of transforming the company’s ideals into an aesthetically pleasing yet evocative logo. They wanted to convey strength, elegance, and cultural diversity. What they most certainly didn’t like was a logo that would make potential clients say in unison, “What the…?”

Crowdsourcing offers a plethora of designs from a legion of mediocre designers who submit their work, knowing that there is a reasonably high likelihood that their submission will neither be chosen nor paid for. To some people, it might be the perfect method for outsourcing your design work. The terms “competition” and “contest” conjure up images of healthy and vigorous capitalism. It’s a contest! Open to all!  In your head, it’s a pool of designers creating notebooks full of sketches and amazing logo concept work for your company or brand.

Unfortunately, that’s just in your head. Crowdsourcing design work devalues the work of the designers and fails to raise the profile of the companies. Small to medium-sized businesses almost always suffer from crowdsourcing, since designers have no idea about the company’s goals, and the talent level of designers is usually very “green” to say the least.  Submissions are often of poor quality because the prize stakes are considerably lower, both in terms of monetary value and prestige. And the designers? Designers find themselves in an increasingly unstable economic industry, often entering fruitless contests for a corporate culture that no longer truly respects their work.

So what happened to James? Well, the launch of the new brand image didn’t attract new clients. James lost substantial revenue that quarter and nursed a team of upset marketing employees who harbored a grudge against crowdsourced design and fertility dolls for the rest of their lives.  Don’t be like James, don’t crowdsource your design work. It’s like playing the lottery; you’re probably not going to win.

Data-Driven Brand Development

Want a best-selling brand? We can help! SmashBrand is a data-driven brand development and packaging design company specializing in FMCG and CPG products. From brand strategy to packaging design testing, our Path To Performance™ process guarantees a packaging that converts on shelves. Book a time to discuss your project with our team.

Subscribe to
Nice Package.

SmashBrand’s Nice Package: Stay current with our latest insights

Free Resource.
CPG product repositioning guide.
CPG product repositioning guide.

Explore the five undeniable signs your CPG product needs repositioning along with strategies for leveraging consumer insights for a guaranteed market lift.

Download Whitepaper About CPG product repositioning guide.

More from SmashBrand

NICE PACKAGE, Design

The Problem with Packaging Design That Looks Different.

Most brands chase standout visuals without asking a harder question, does it make the product easier to recognize and buy? That gap kills performance. If your design stands out but doesn’t convert, it’s failing. Want to see why? Read on.

Category Insights, Shopping With Christy

Why Rao’s Soup Misses the Mark on This Packaging Design.

Brand extension can be a powerful growth strategy, but only if it’s executed with clarity. In this case, the transition from pasta sauce into soup creates confusion rather than differentiation. The biggest issue is visual overlap. Using the same jar, color palette, and overall look as the pasta sauce line makes it difficult to immediately…

Category Insights

This Retail Display Tells You Everything About a Brand in Trouble

When packaging starts working against the brand, it shows up quickly, especially on the shelf. In this case, the execution creates confusion instead of clarity. The most immediate issue is readability. If shoppers can’t quickly identify the brand name or fully read the tagline, the pack loses its primary job: recognition. “Thirst’s worst” is a…

Category Insights

Why This Parent and CPG Marketer Secretly Loves This “White” Bread

Sometimes the most powerful packaging change is verbal. A single line of copy can unlock the entire value proposition. In this case, the product already solved a real consumer tension: the desire for healthier bread that still feels and tastes like white bread. But previously, that benefit was implied rather than stated. Shoppers had to…

Category Insights

Wait, Sargento Makes Crackers Now? Not Exactly

Brand extensions only work when trust transfers seamlessly, and that’s where this execution creates friction. At first glance, the product signals cheese, not crackers. The name, visuals, and dominant cues all lean heavily into cheese equity, leaving the actual product format unclear. That confusion matters. Shoppers rely on quick recognition, and if they can’t immediately…

Category Insights

Is Coke Lime making a Comeback?

Limited-time innovation only works if timing and design align with consumer expectations. A citrus-forward cola immediately signals refreshment, which is typically associated with warmer months. Launching that profile in October creates a subtle disconnect, even if the execution is strong. From a strategy standpoint, this is a classic line extension play, leveraging an existing brand…